Writer : Jose Antonio Lorenzo L. Tamayo
Year : 2022
Religious rituals were a way of life for pre-Hispanic Filipinos even before the arrival of the Spaniards and the introduction of Christianity in the Philippines. The pagan practices gradually changed when Christianity deeply penetrated the culture of the natives. The conduct of the fiesta was introduced by the Spaniards, particularly the religious orders that came to the Philippines, to entice the principalias (nobility) and the ordinary people to transfer to the newly established pueblos (towns). As the fiesta came with a hefty cost, an hermano mayor (major sponsor) was selected from a pool of local elite to sponsor the expenses. After five hundred years, while the hermano mayor tradition is still apparent, it is only a passing theme in extant literature. The purpose of this study is to explore and describe the centuries-old tradition, create a profile of those who have become an hermano mayor in modern times, and understand why such a tradition persists to this day. Moreover, personal interviews, a survey, anecdotes, and photo documentations were used in discussing this unique religious and cultural practice in the Philippines.
hermano mayor, hermana mayor, hermanos mayores, sponsorship tradition, religious practice, colonisation, cofradia, hermandad, Catholicism, Philippines
Another way to explain the significant relationship between the babaylan and the datu is the precolonial religion. Ancient Filipinos believed that the natural environment was inhabited by either good or bad spirits and the only way to appease them was for the babaylan to offer sacrifices and perform necessary religious rituals (Reyes 1985). Hence, in the agrarian setting, rituals were conducted in the hope of gaining fair weather conditions, which would lead to a good harvest. In these ornate rituals, aside from the participation of the community, it was customary for the datu and the members of the local nobility to take part and sponsor the entirety or some aspects of the rituals, which at times would last for days. Del Castillo (2015) adds that churches as places of worship were unknown to pre-Hispanic Filipinos; hence, an altar for the nagaanito (worshippers) was erected in the house of the datu.
A proof to support this claim was the pre-Hispanic rites in the town of Morong in the province of Rizal. In his article on the potato lamb feast on Maundy Thursday, Edric Calma (2009) elaborates the five features of Indigenous traditions in Morong: feasting was a periodic activity conducted by the natives, feasting was sponsored by the local elite, high-value foods such as pigs and cows were served in specialised dishes, the lower class practised panunulungan (volunteerism), and the sponsorship of the local elites led to the expansion of their social and political prestige. Analysing these features, there was a necessity for the local elites to sponsor the rituals given its ornateness and the hefty costs that came alongside it. When the Philippines was formally colonised by Spain in the 16th century, the ritual sponsorship tradition persisted, but it transcended to another form that fitted the colonial regime and the traditions of the Catholic Church. As the Spaniards introduced absolute ownership of land and the gradual improvement of agricultural technology in the late 18th century, the principalias (‘the old nobility’) took advantage of this transformation (Encyclopædia Britannica 2021), profited from their vast farmlands and reinforced their status in society. The early missionaries meanwhile introduced the concept of the fiesta which focused on the patron saint of the población (town proper) or barrio (neighbourhood) to efficiently convert the natives to Catholicism. As the fiesta gradually replaced the precolonial rituals of early Filipinos, it also came with a high cost. Such practice was then used to lure the principalias which, in later years, would be an instrument to elevate their social prestige when all (if not many of them) assumed the role of the hermano mayor (major sponsor) during fiesta time. In Spanish vocabulary, the term hermano mayor translates to an older brother. The hermano mayor in the Philippine context, however, is used to describe an individual (hermano for a male sponsor or hermana mayor for a female sponsor) or a group of people (hermanos mayores) who are chosen by the parish priest or a church recognised organisation (e.g. cofradia, hermandad) to sponsor the fiesta activities.
The purpose of this article is to explore the hermano mayor tradition in the Philippines. While this kind of sponsorship is still extant today and is apparent especially in the provinces, the custom has never been fully investigated, given the scarcity of available references. Even with present literature available, it is just a passing theme buried in extensive subjects. Soledad Borromeo-Bühler (1985), for one, discusses the 19th century social class structure in Cavite and uses the hermano mayor narrative as one of the themes in depicting class struggles in the colonial days. Similarly, while the work of Braulio Sibug translated by Lourdes Vidal (2018) from Capampangan to Tagalog, vividly describes being an hermano mayor in the context of a barrio, it is nonetheless a work of fiction. The closest discussion is the article of Calma (2009), which discusses the unique Maundy Thursday tradition in Morong, Rizal called the Cordero (potato lamb) where the hermano mayor is central to the success of the celebration. One fact that can be ascertained is the constant struggle among the social classes and the pursuit of social assimilation of the new rich. Therefore, this present study aims to understand and create a descriptive profile of those who served as an hermano mayor between 1980 and 2019. The study will then uncover whether the motivation of those who have become an hermano mayor in contemporary times is still about the need for social prestige in the community. In the process, the study will also explore the changes in the conduct of said custom. Calma (2009) identifies that old, rich families who can sponsor church rituals have been scarce through the years. Thus, one way to fill this gap is to explain how such a reality affected the hermano mayor tradition that generated a tolerance for certain variations in the practice today. The incumbent study will examine and discuss four domains: (1) fiesta as a religious pageantry, (2) the hermano mayor of earlier times, (3) imaging the hermano mayor, and (4) the hermano mayor in contemporary times.
In creating a descriptive profile of the hermano mayor, the writer supplements the discussions with information from personal interviews and a survey. Six respondents were interviewed for this study including Rev. Fr. Miguel Ramon Chan of the Archdiocese of Cebu; Dr. Louie Nacorda, author and cultural heritage advocate in Cebu; Arwin Paul Lingat, member of the Archdiocesan Committee on Church Heritage in the Archdiocese of San Fernando in Pampanga; and Mario Aniceto Sumera, Mrs. Ligaya Munar and Jeremy Niño de Vega, who were hermanos mayores in the past. The interviews were conducted personally, via video conferencing on Zoom, Facebook chats or calls through Messenger. In addition, a survey of 32 individuals who assumed the role of hermano or hermana mayor between 1980 and 2019 was also conducted. The survey was created through Google Forms, and the link to the survey was openly shared through the Facebook page, Instagram and YouTube account of Arte Sacra Ph. Cluster sampling was also maximised by creating an online group chat where the link to the online survey was shared with individuals who were former hermanos mayores. These respondents are personally known by the writer. More so, some respondents from the group chat referred the online survey to other individuals who have experienced becoming an hermano mayor. The survey contained both closed- and open-ended questions, and inquired regarding the respondents’ overall experience as an hermano mayor. Given that the writer had been an hermano mayor three times in the past, personal anecdotes and photographic documentation were also shared in elaborating certain points in the study.
While early Filipinos were more tolerant of the Hispanisation process, some natives were hesitant to transfer in the reducciones because the majority were subsistence farmers or fishermen and transferring to new pueblos would affect their livelihood. The missionaries solved this problem by introducing the visita system wherein a small chapel was erected in various barrios or sitios (‘hamlet’), which was attached to the mother parish located in the población. These visitas were dedicated to a patron saint and were often visited by the parish priest who would use these chapels in both administering civil policies and conducting religious services such as scheduled masses, weddings and baptisms (Coseteng 1972). Regardless of whether one resided in the población or barrio, the conduct of the fiesta was introduced by the early missionaries to further their evangelical efforts. The fiesta was also used as a marketing scheme. Reinhard Wendt (1998), who examined Philippine fiesta and colonial culture, describes in detail how the Jesuits conducted the fiesta and the liturgical celebrations in the colonial days. In a report to the Holy See, the Jesuits mentioned that their fiestas were celebrated with pomp, diversity and plenty of entertainment. These fiestas would promote the grandeur of the new religion and shame the pre-Hispanic rituals of the natives by displaying much exuberance. In a recorded 17th century fiesta in Zamboanga, the Jesuit parish priest made sure that the fiesta would be nostalgic: the church was covered with clay tiles, which was a status symbol during those days; an assortment of fireworks displays was held; and a rather interesting bull fight caught the attention of many spectators, including the Moros (‘Muslims’) (Combés, Retana, & Pastells 1897).
These fiestas in Zamboanga were perfect templates of how the early missionaries used aesthetic fascination to convert the natives to Catholicism. In the fiestas of the Spanish colonial era, nostalgia and attracting the five senses mattered and this could be achieved through art, food, architecture, and public performance, among others (Tamayo 2020; Wendt 1998). In the end, these proceedings aimed to achieve two things: impose the Christian message and legitimise the power of the colonial regime. These were successfully achieved by subjecting participants to leave momentarily their present reality, and, in the process of participating, they were moulded to assimilate the ideas, values and concepts promoted by the Spaniards. Others, however, viewed the fiesta as a form of excess (Wendt 1998). The fiesta normally began with a nine-day novena in honour of the patron saint and culminates during the saint’s feast day. In a span of ten days, a staggering amount of money is needed to fund all the activities related to the fiesta, especially in the población where fiestas were supposedly grander in scale. Those who say the fiestas as decadent would be reminded to contemplate instead (Wendt 1998). Amid the vanity of it all, what matters was the sincere devotion of the people to the patron saint. The natives completed the novenas and attended the activities during fiesta day in the hope that their prayers would be answered. This stemmed from the fact that the fiesta also adopted pre-Hispanic constructs (Wendt 1998), which paved the way for folk Catholicism to prosper.
In contemporary Philippines where Catholicism is still the predominant religion, the celebration of fiestas and important liturgical events is alive and almost untouched despite the introduction of other Christian denominations and the constantly changing economic landscape. While the intention is neither to Christianise nor legitimise the power of a colonial regime, what remains interesting are the modern Filipinos’ continuing fascination for aestheticism, ornate rituals and nostalgia, which still penetrate the fiesta of today (Figure 1).
Mario Aniceto Sumera, a production designer by profession, recounts his motivations for becoming an hermano mayor in Paombong, Bulacan between the 1970s and 1980s. As a young boy, he first served as a kapitan (‘minor sponsor’) in the barrio fiesta of San Isidro (Saint Isidore) and later, in his teenage years, as an hermano mayor together with his father in the same fiesta. He indicated two reasons why he accepted the role: first, it was customary for each member of the family and other relatives to serve as an hermano mayor in the barrio fiesta as a form of devotion; second, he recollected that it was also a form of thanksgiving at the time. Sumera added that his name was inscribed by his mother and grandmother in the roster of hermanos. In this case, he had no say regarding the matter and had to wait for a couple of years before he could finally take his turn as an hermano mayor. As a veteran hermano mayor who attended many fiestas, he clarified a common misconception that fiestas in the barrios are less expensive to conduct compared with the one in the población, which is not true. Fiestas in the barrios consume more resources because the hermano mayor is expected to open house to the entire neighbourhood, whereas in the población the guest list could be controlled. On the contrary, he cited a tradition in the barrio where residents would pool a certain amount of money to curb the expenses of the present hermano mayor. It is known as an act of pangingilak or solicitation. The money collected from residents could be used as payment for the brass band, choir or decorations.
In an interview with Mrs. Ligaya Munar, the writer’s aunt who served as a kapitana for the fiesta of Sta. Elena (St. Helena) during her teenage years in the 1960s and as an hermana mayor during the fiesta of San Antonio de Padua (St. Anthony of Padua) in the early 1990s in Hagonoy, Bulacan (Figure 2), shared three reasons why people assumed the role of an hermano or hermana, especially during her heydays: as a form of thanksgiving, because an individual had a special intention, or the individual was promised to the patron saint by a family member or distant relative. She cannot exactly remember the reason why she served as a kapitana in the May fiesta of Sta. Elena but affirmed that it was a common practice back then. On the contrary, being an hermana mayor for the fiesta of San Antonio de Padua had a deeper motivation. Mrs. Munar explained that her late aunt, Mrs. Valenta Dizon-Garcia, was an hermana mayor at the National Shrine of St. Anne in the población for the fiesta of San Antonio de Pauda – to whom she was devoted – in the 1950s (Figure 3). Mrs. Garcia promised Attorney Cristeta Tamayo, Mrs. Munar’s sister and the writer’s mother, to become an hermana mayor for passing the bar examination. A few years later, Mrs. Munar was volunteered by her sister to the fiesta organisers. In a way, the custom of being an hermana mayor in Mrs. Munar’s family is motivated by the family’s devotion and as a form of thanksgiving for the blessings received through the intercession of San Antonio de Padua.
Aside from the vara alta, outfits are another important emblem that an hermano mayor considers. This is proven by the survey results of this study, as the majority of the hermanos mayores mentioned that they allot at least 10.63 per cent of their total fiesta budget for their fashion ensemble. One clear expectation for any hermano mayor is to always look presentable. This is why hermanos mayores invest in the kind of outfit that they wear, especially during the misa mayor and procession where many eyes are looking. As the writer has observed, the trend regarding fashion choices for the hermano mayor tradition has not changed much over time. In many vintage and recent photo documentations, an hermana mayor opted for the classic Filipiniana attire and the styles varied (e.g. traje de mestiza, balintawak, terno) (Figure 5); meanwhile, an hermano mayor would simply wear the classic Barong Tagalog made of either piña (‘pineapple fibre’), jusi (‘abaca fibre’), silk cocoon or a combination. Delicate embroidery is also applied on the barong. The estimated price of custom made Filipiniana attire for women may cost today between PHP20,000 (USD392) and PHP150,000 (USD2,941) depending on the brand, designer and materials used. The same factors are true for fine barong produced by couturiers that may cost between PHP10,000 (USD196) and PHP30,000 (USD588). There are no restrictions as to the colour scheme of the ensemble an hermano or hermana mayor wears, but the more conservative ones would prefer a white or off-white colour scheme. Sometimes, a cofradia (‘confraternity’) or the parish prescribes the kind of outfit and colour scheme that an hermano or hermana must adhere to. An example is the practice of the Cofradia de la Inmaculada Concepcion in Intramuros, Manila where incumbent and past hermanos mayores are requested to wear a classic white ensemble with a matching blue-and-white sash during the festivity every first Sunday of December as a nod to the purity of the Virgin Mary. More so, there are instances when parish priests would like the hermana mayor to dress conservatively (i.e. no plunging neckline, no tight-fitting gowns, not too revealing). The outfit is not complete without some show-stopping jewellery – many of which are heirloom pieces, especially in the case of those hermanos or hermanas belonging to old wealth. Recently, an embroidered escapulario (‘scapular’) or medal containing the insignia of the patron has become quite fashionable for contemporary hermanos mayores.
Starting in the early 2000s, the author noticed that there was a gradual shift in the selection and number of hermanos mayores serving a particular fiesta. In the case of the Diocesan Shrine and Parish of Our Lady of Mercy in Novaliches, Quezon City, it was customary to select an hermano mayor from distinguished families for the annual town fiesta (Figure 6). However, a transition happened in 2008, as the parish opened the practice to regular parishioners given that all prestigious families in town had already served their tenure as an hermano mayor and because nobody wants to shoulder the burden of the hefty costs. The parish then selected individuals representing each Basic Ecclesial Communities (BECs) to solve the problem. Instead of one individual or family spending for all the fiesta expenses, those chosen from the BECs were only asked a minimum of PHP10,000 (USD196) as an entry point to become one of the hermanos or hermanas. To this day, the same practice ensues and there are at least 10 hermanos mayores every town fiesta. The trend of having multiple hermanos in a fiesta is seemingly becoming normal these days as 17 out of 32 survey respondents admitted that they were accompanied by other individuals when they had assumed the role of hermano mayor. This trend can also be observed in many fiestas today (e.g. Sto. Niño de Malolos Foundation, Cofradia de la Inmaculada Concepcion). In line with the selection process, the survey results show that a prospective hermano mayor is mainly chosen under two circumstances: (1) someone from the parish invited a possible hermano mayor, or (2) an individual personally volunteered to assume the role of an hermano mayor. These two circumstances, however, do not always apply to all parishes in the Philippines. Some parishes do not discriminate parishioners who would like to become an hermano or hermana mayor. Arwin Paul Lingat, member of the Archdiocesan Committee on Church Heritage in the Archdiocese of San Fernando, shares that the process of selecting the hermano mayor in most Pampanga towns is done by people’s acclamation. In Betis, for example, there is an annual gathering during the Epiphany where people cast their votes for the next president of the comite de festejos (‘fiesta committee’). The elected president acts as the supposed hermano mayor. In contrast, the practice in Bacolor is by selecting the members of the Centro Catolico, an organisation composed of the laity designated to plan the fiesta of the La Naval de Bacolor and the activities in line with Advent and Holy Week. Unlike other towns, the people selected in the said organisation are not necessarily members of the local elite; however, they are expected to donate or solicit money for the fiesta activities.
A recent development in the conduct of the town fiesta is the interest of the local government in meddling in religious traditions. This has an adverse effect and has challenged the traditional notion of being an hermano mayor. In some Philippine towns where the fiesta of a local patron saint has turned into a big festival or annual tourist attraction, the municipality would create a fiesta committee instead of having an hermano mayor. The role of the parish is limited to the conduct of the novena masses, processional route and church services, whereas the municipal government takes the role of the hermano mayor as it controls many facets of the fiesta, provides catering services and entertains guests and members of the media. The case of the Pahiyas Festival in Lucban, Quezon illustrates this context as the local government organises an executive committee that oversees the annual fiesta (Antolihao 2014). Arwin Paul Lingat also exemplifies the feast of Apung Iru (St. Peter) in Apalit, Pampanga where both civic and religious activities are managed by the annual fiesta committee. In other towns that celebrate the so-called Pistang Bayan (the town’s foundation day), it is customary for the town mayor or a local politician to automatically assume the role of hermano mayor for as long as they stay in power (Figure 7). The town of Hagonoy in Bulacan conducts this practice where a High Mass, a procession highlighting the town’s patron saint and a reception open to the public are held, which are all sponsored by the local government.
In the Bicol region, it is also necessary to have a cabo mayor (the region’s equivalent of an hermano mayor) during the singing ritual of the dotoc every May in honour of the Holy Cross. As such, barrio Sta. Cruz in the town of Baao signals the selection of the cabo mayor early in the morning when a crier awakes everyone by banging an aluminium basin or metal plate and shouts “‘Miting kan magna gurang!’” (‘meeting of the elders’), which means that a meeting will be held by evening of that day. The first issue to be settled during the meeting is the selection of the cabo mayor and cabo menor or kagab-iyan (‘minor sponsors’). The cabo mayor serves as the chief sponsor during the visperas mayor and actual fiesta, while those chosen as cabo menor are in charge of the first eight nights of the dotoc (Llana 2009). In some regions in the Philippines, the practice of being an hermano mayor is, as a matter of fact, not in vogue and the tradition seems to have been adopted quite recently or is in transition. In Barili, Cebu, Rev. Fr. Miguel Ramon Chan of the Diocesan Shrine of St. Anne recounts that the practice was performed for a certain period, but the parish fails to sustain it. Despite this, the Basilica Minore del Santo Niño in Cebu City, which is under the Augustinians, revived the tradition. It is said that the practice of having an hermano mayor started in 1565 when conquistador Miguel Lopez de Legazpi was considered the first hermano mayor; on the contrary, there are no records of succeeding hermanos after Legazpi, and the practice stopped for roughly four hundred years until the Augustinians drafted a resolution to finally revive the tradition. It was only in 1965 that the first hermano mayor in modern times – through the person of former Chief Justice of the Philippines, Jose Yulo and his spouse – assumed the role (Ceciban 2019). Meanwhile, Dr. Louie Nacorda, a cultural heritage practitioner in Cebu, shared in an interview with the writer that the Cebu Metropolitan Cathedral only started having an hermano mayor in 2000 when he was still active in the Parish Pastoral Council of the cathedral and proposed the idea to the parish priest at the time. He adds that there were some years when the cathedral even had one hermano menor (‘minor sponsor’) per novena day while the hermano mayor would simply appear during the actual fiesta.
A survey of 32 individuals who served as hermano mayor between 1980 and 2019 helped to understand further their motivations and perceptions in accepting such a daunting obligation. Out of 32 respondents, 27 were former hermanos and five were hermanas. The majority of the respondents assumed the role of hermano or hermana mayor when they were between 21 and 40 years of age (Figure 8). Interestingly, one respondent admitted that he first served as an hermano when he was 81 years old. The survey also asked the number of times the respondents have become an hermano mayor throughout their lifetime. Twelve respondents have become an hermano mayor more than four times, 11 respondents about two times, seven respondents one time and at least three times for two respondents. These numbers indicate that the majority of the respondents welcome successive opportunities of becoming an hermano mayor in their respective parishes. Moreover, the respondents suggested four criteria as to why they accepted the obligation: (1) thanksgiving for the blessings received, (2) special devotion to the saint, (3) panata or vow of the family, and (4) if no one in the parish would like to accept the role. When it comes to planning the town fiesta, most of the respondents mentioned that they were either “‘very hands-on’” (13 respondents) or they worked “‘hand-in-hand’” with the parish priest or fiesta committee (14 respondents). One respondent admitted that he just gave a specific amount to the fiesta committee to avoid distress. On the one hand, some respondents would go the extra mile by conducting several meetings with fellow hermanos to polish the activities and other matters related to the fiesta.
An important factor when one becomes an hermano mayor is the working budget; thus, the survey inquired about the total amount that the previous hermanos mayores spent during their town fiesta. Most of the respondents admitted that they spent an average of PHP51,000 (USD1,000) to PHP200,000 (USD3,921). Four respondents, meanwhile, mentioned that they spent an average of PHP701,000 (USD13,745) to PHP1,000,000 (USD19,607) during their tenure as an hermano mayor, while two respondents spent a staggering amount of more than a million pesos. When asked about their source of funding for the fiesta, many of them cited that their funds either came from personal savings or that their family and friends extended financial support. Surprisingly, one respondent admitted that he secured a loan to fund the fiesta activities. In the interview conducted with Mario Aniceto Sumera, a technique that he and his fellow hermanos followed before they assumed the role of hermanos mayores in the fiesta of the Sto. Niño de Malolos in 2015 was through a paluwagan. For 12 months, each hermano would make mandatory monthly contributions, and the total money they saved for a year was used for the fiesta expenses.
Regardless of the budget, any hermano mayor would divide their budget based on the activities and essential needs of the town fiesta. Philippine fiestas are really expensive to conduct, and they consume a lot of resources that include, but are not limited to, the following: food, donations, decorations and labour. The hermano mayor puts prime importance on food being served during the fiesta reception. In fact, food takes the bulk in the fiesta budget, as the survey results reveal that an average of 35.41 per cent is spent for this aspect. Seldom does the parish shoulder the catering services during the fiesta unless it is generous enough to lend a helping hand to the hermano mayor. There are also instances in other parishes where the parish and the hermano mayor would have different receptions. The parish would probably conduct it in the convento (‘convent’) or parish hall, while the hermano may hold it either at home or any event space that could occupy dozens of guests. Although a rarity, there are also occasions when an hermano would foot the expenses for both the reception in the parish convent and at home. In the case of the Cebu Metropolitan Cathedral, Dr. Nacorda reminisces that the cathedral has sponsored the reception through the years. He estimates that the budget allocated for food per person in the 1990s was about PHP90 (USD1.8). In 2018, however, the hermanos mayores came from a family of successful entrepreneurs, so they specifically sponsored the fiesta reception as well. The said reception was opened publicly, and the budget for food per person tremendously increased to PHP500 (USD9.80).
Even though it is not mandatory (unless the parish priest has requested it), many hermanos mayores set aside a certain budget to donate to the local parish. In the survey, an average of 20.94 per cent of the total budget is donated to the parish. The donation may come in different forms. It could be in cash or in kind. Some would donate cash that is intended for repairs or improvement of the parish. An hermana mayor in Hagonoy, Bulacan, who is a successful professional in California, donated USD1,000 so that the parish could repair the kneeler padding of all the church pews. More so, a prominent family in Novaliches, Quezon City who served as hermanos mayores in the early 2000s donated PHP350,000 (USD6,862) to the parish after the town fiesta. In Malolos, Bulacan, the annual hermanos would donate in kind (i.e. microphones, sound system, lighting, air-conditioning units), or they would shoulder the repair works of the Sto. Niño chapel (i.e. renovation of the sacristy, painting work, altar restoration). The hermanos would also sponsor the decorations inside and outside the church as well as on the streets where the procession would pass. Until the late 1990s, Barangay Sto. Niño in Hagonoy, Bulacan used to be visited by throngs of tourists during their annual fiesta in February. The street decorations were noted for their intricacy. Visitors even tagged the decorations as “langit-langitan” (‘like heaven’), as the buntings made of plastic wrappers in various colours were intertwined with each other so that those walking below them would be sheltered from the sun. This activity was possible then because the hermano mayor at times motivated each samahan (‘street organization’) by giving a cash prize for the street with the best decorations. Most of the time, it was simply a communal gesture of the neighborhood to bedeck the streets with lavish decorations. Unfortunately, given the rising prices of basic commodities and migration from the community, the tradition faltered. The same reality is true for many parishes in the Philippines, and most of the time the decorations are mainly limited to the altar, the church patio and selected areas. Despite rising inflation rates, the survey indicates that contemporary hermanos spent an average of 15.37 per cent of their total fiesta budget on decorations. Last, there are miscellaneous activities before, during and after the fiesta that use labour such as the brass bands, orchestra and choir, dance troupes, decorators of the various fiesta venues, the carroza (‘processional carriage’) pullers, makeup artists, cleanup operations after the fiesta, among others (Figure 9). The survey respondents agree that they separated a budget averaging 11.18 per cent as payment for labour.
One thing that the writer personally learned after serving as an hermano mayor thrice in a row is to brace oneself for unexpected problems and challenges that may come before and during the fiesta. Those hermanos and hermanas who answered the survey reveal all kinds of challenges that they personally experienced during their tenure as hermano mayor. As expected, the most common concern is the unstable weather during the fiesta day. At least nine respondents shared that they experienced heavy rainfall during their term. Many of them resolved this problem by distributing umbrellas to guests, and some turned to folk Catholicism by offering eggs to St. Claire. In addition, scheduling meetings and limited preparation are also cited concerns, which were solved by proper communication and delegating tasks to the right people. Attitudes of individuals surrounding the hermano mayor could also make or break the fiesta preparations. Some respondents cited two types of problematic ethos: those individuals who are considered “‘pakialamera’” (nosy) and those who spread malicious gossip. While these obstacles are somehow unavoidable, the respondents agree on one thing: “‘the show must go on.’” Surprisingly, seven respondents admitted that they did not experience any notable problems during their term as hermano mayor.
As per the overall satisfaction of the hermanos and hermanas, the majority emphasised that they were either extremely satisfied (16 respondents) or very satisfied (11 respondents) with the proceedings of the fiesta. The most significant moments for many respondents are the pontifical mass, the opening of religious exhibits as part of the fiesta activities, and the procession. The hermanos and hermanas also reflected that their position made them realised a thing or two: a sense of fulfillment; a realisation that being an hermano mayor is not about fame and glory; blessings received after assuming the role of hermano; and gratitude for all the help that people extended them. Three respondents pondered that their tenure as hermanos made their devotion to the patron saint stronger. Similarly, three respondents cited that “‘nothing is impossible with God’.” One of the respondents also offered an alternative reflection for being an hermano mayor. For him, serving as an hermano mayor is not merely about one’s devotion to the saint, but the role is significant to the preservation of cultural heritage in a particular locality.
When the survey respondents were asked about their willingness to become an hermano mayor in future fiestas, 24 respondents answered that they would accept the role without a second thought. Those who said otherwise stressed that their decision would be influenced by their age and financial status. Others mentioned that they would probably let their children assume the role or give a chance to other parishioners. Meanwhile, two respondents emphasised that they would only accept the role if it is “‘kalooban ng langit’” (‘God’s will’).
The hermanos mayores in contemporary times, despite the financial and logistical obstacles aligned with the role, give their utmost efforts in making the town or barrio fiesta a success because, by doing so, they are fulfilling a much higher form of devotion: some are doing it as a personal promise, for thanksgiving to an answered prayer, for curing an ailment or for a special intention. These contradict the notion that hermanos and hermanas only assume the role because of social assimilation or prestige in the community. In addition, one important aspect that many hermanos mayores fail to recognise is that the role they play has a direct impact on the cultural heritage of the church and their respective communities as well as in the local economy. Without their financial support, many practices would be diminished. Performing arts, including choral groups, brass bands and dance troupes, who are primarily responsible for setting a festive rhythm in a fiesta, would not thrive. Intangible traditions such as the salinan or sunduan, also known as dapit (an act of fetching the town patron or the hermano mayor ), and other related practices would be extinguished. Through the fiesta patronage, the local economy also prospers even in the short term: the fiesta generates several jobs that positively affect both skilled and unskilled workers, businesses, artists and designers.
Anthropologist Liana Chua (2007) notes that objects are not simply used as a gateway to worship a higher being, but they act as facilitators of “‘doing religion’.” This could be observed in the use of iconography such as a vara alta, an escapulario or medallion and even the outfits of the hermanos mayores. These objects put meanings in the practice with an interplay between the social and religious spectrums. The vara alta, for example, is a sacramental that contains an image of the patron saint, but it also distinguishes the hermano or hermana mayor from the crowd. It may be a symbol of authority and piety; however, it also conveys social distinction in the community. The same is true for the escapulario, medallion and outfit that an hermano wears. These objects would also relate to the ceremonial side of religion, as they are used in “‘church-centered rites to secular rituals’” that are sanctioned by the community’s culture (Jocano 1967). What is probably true in the hermano mayor tradition beginning in the early 2000s is the modification of the practice to “‘suit one’s cultural ways of believing’” and restructuring it “‘to accommodate the nuances of the new pattern’” (Jocano 1967). In the past, those who were selected as an hermano mayor came from old wealth and prominent families. Additionally, it was common then for a single person or a couple to assume the role. This has been modified, and a variation is tolerated in the practice such that a group of like-minded individuals, regardless of their social position in the community, may now become hermanos mayores. In contrast, the local government may also intervene these days and act as the hermano mayor instead of selecting particular individuals. These changes may imply four things depending on the community: economic hardships pushed communities to look for alternatives, so the practice or the town fiesta itself may continue; the fact that old families in various towns are dwindling in numbers as their heirs emigrate elsewhere or lose their fortunes; there is an increasing number of the new rich or middle class who have the resources to take the position; or there is a need to create a steering committee that would oversee the entire fiesta that turned into a bigger festival attracting both local and foreign tourists.
While the fiesta is a pan-regional event that has religious underpinnings, regional typologies would differentiate the hermano mayor tradition across the Philippines and could indicate whether they overlap with linguistic regions Christianised by certain religious orders. This has yet to be established and is worthy of longitudinal investigation. However, based on the writer’s observation given the present data, the only difference in the practice is the selection of an hermano mayor in certain towns or regions, but the obligation is just the same: to sponsor both church and secular activities aligned with the fiesta. Certainly, the practice is apparent in Tagalog towns and is currently being revived in the población of some regions as in the case of Cebu City. Why the practice is widely accepted in Tagalog territory compared with other linguistic regions and the reason why it did not successfully permeate in succession in some towns are lingering questions that still beg answers. Despite the limitations of the present study, the hermano mayor tradition, nonetheless, proves that three Filipino values are present during fiesta time: the spirit of bayanihan (‘community effort’), pakikisama (‘comradeship’) and pakikipagkapwa (‘shared self’). As the survey results and interviews suggest, when many of the previous hermanos volunteered to assume the role or when those teenagers showed willingness to decorate the entire street at night without expecting anything in return is already sufficient proof that these values are indeed alive in the Filipino soul. The practice of being an hermano mayor is here to stay because the fiesta clearly represents what it is to be a Filipino.